Noting that domain names are exhausting, why not buy domain names for your kids as a gift for them when they grow up. My parents did a good job in giving me an unique name, that I found shuva.in available even after 30 Gregorian years and at 74.9 Internet years. Yes I am 74.9 internet years old as per whatsmyinternetage.com.

Back to the point, the new domains I got for my 2.5 year old daughter are tishadeb.com and tishadeb.in

On a related note, of late I have found that the cheapest web hosting solution exists at nearlyfreespeech.net. It all about clould hosting and you pay for what you use.

Happy internetting.//

Imagine this:

You try to register by creating a user name and password. Its common and expected for the system to force you to choose a unique user name. However how would you react if you get a message that says:

"This password is already taken, please choose a unique password"

--- Is this the way to prevent password reuse? Darn!

Happy passwording.//

I came across this interesting metric called "Cyclomatic complexity" at work today. It is measurement of how complex a function is in terms of the logical branches it has.

The formal definition as in Wikipedia is quite mathematical and not in tune with the thinking of the like minded people visiting my blog.

A far less and simple definition can be found at this code project article which says to calculate this metric:

• Start with 1 for a straight path through the routine.
• Add 1 for each of the following keywords or their equivalent: if, while, repeat, for, and, or.
• Add 1 for each case in a switch statement.

There is another defintion as seen in Ncover's site which says

The cyclomatic complexity value is the maximum number of test cases needed to get 100% branch coverage, and the minimum number of test cases needed to exercise every path through a method, so it provides a good way to tell how well-tested a method is.

Happy cyclomatting.//

I never knew that we have so many software development methods that exist until I read some stuff today. If you had asked me yesterday I would have said:

1. Waterfall ---- thats what I learnt in my first few months at TCS.

2. Spiral --- the diagram when I first saw looked confusing, but thats what I do mostly these days.

3. Extreme programming --- I had spent some time with a start up. Definitely productive with so less management interference. You were almost always the boss but of an extremely small team and which is sometimes just you.

The others which are interesting to know and are formal methods are:

1. Structured Programming Development -- everything is structured, disciplined.

2. Cleanroom -- strong focus towards defect prevention. Quality is though design+coding and not testing.

3. Iterative development -- I dont know how this is different from the Spiral method.

4. Prototyping --- do prototyping, go to user, re-prototype until acceptable. Sounds like RnD project to me.

5. Modified Prototype Model --- Like web-page maintenance. Start simple, keep on modifying based on user needs.

6. Rapid Application Development --- No time, just do it.

7. Joint Analysis Development --- Developers work closely with end-users to develop the software.

8. Exploratory model --- Requirements not known initially, but lets start the project and we will see what is needed.

That makes eleven Software Development models. Woow!

Happy Modelling.//

I fond this nice site comparing various cross-platform XML libraries. They have a very good benchmark data with lots of graphs. Very useful for making project decisions:

Feature comparison

Benchmark sheet 1

Benchmark sheet 2

Happy XXLing.//